Prepare Part 2 of the template according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide
HQS 620 Communication Plan Assignment
Assessment Description
The purpose of this assignment is to create a communication plan for stakeholders. This communication plan is in relation to the case study you selected in the Class Resources.
Complete the “Communication Plan Template” located in the topic Resources folder.
This assignment requires two or three scholarly resources.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
Prepare Part 2 of the template according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
Resources
Collapse All
What Drives Continuous Improvement Project Success in Healthcare?
Read “What Drives Continuous Improvement Project Success in Healthcare?” by Stelson, Hille, Eseonu, and Doolen, from Internat
… Read More
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJHCQA-03-2016-0035/full/pdf?title=what-drives-continuous-improvement-project-success-in-healthcare
Communication Plan Template
Utilize the “Communication Plan Template” to complete the topic assignment.
HQS-620-RS-CommunicationPlanTemplate.docx
Project Change Stakeholder Communication
Read “Project Change Stakeholder Communication,” by Butt, Naaranoja, and Savolainen, from International Jour
… Read More
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263786316300850
Health Information Privacy
Explore the “Health Information Privacy” section on the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services website.
https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/privacy/index.html
Project Communication Management for Project Managers Based on the PMBOK
Read “Project Communication Management for Project Managers Based on the PMBOK,” by Jainendrakumar, from PM World Journal
… Read More
https://pmworldlibrary.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/pmwj38-Sep2015-Jainendrakumar-project-communication-management-advisory.pdf
Email Communication in Project Management: A Bane or a Blessing?
Read “Email Communication in Project Management: A Bane or a Blessing?” by Smit, Bond-Barnard, Steyn, and Fabris-Rotelli, from
HQS 620 Communication Plan Assignment
HQS 620 Communication Plan Assignment
… Read More
https://search-proquest-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/docview/1928615026?accountid=7374
Effective Communication Management: A Key to Stakeholder Relationship Management in Project-Based Organizations
Read “Effective Communication Management: A Key to Stakeholder Relationship Management in Project-Based Organizations,” by Rajhan
… Read More
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: HQS 620 Communication Plan Assignment
Communication Plan – Rubric
Collapse All
Communication Management Plan Template
30 points
Criteria Description
Communication Management Plan Template
5: Excellent
30 points
Communication Management Plan Template is present and thorough. It includes substantial relevant details.
4: Good
27.6 points
Communication Management Plan Template is present and includes relevant details.
3: Satisfactory
26.4 points
Communication Management Plan Template is present.
2: Less Than Satisfactory
24 points
Communication Management Plan Template is present but is incomplete or incorrect.
1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Communication Management Plan Template is not present.
Communication Cycle
20 points
Criteria Description
Communication Cycle
5: Excellent
20 points
A description and analysis of the elements in the communication cycle is present and thorough.
4: Good
18.4 points
A description and analysis of the elements in the communication cycle is present and detailed.
3: Satisfactory
17.6 points
A description and analysis of the elements in the communication cycle is present.
2: Less Than Satisfactory
16 points
A description and analysis of the elements in the communication cycle is present but lack details or are incomplete.
1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
A description and analysis of the elements in the communication cycle is not present.
Communication strategies
20 points
Criteria Description
Communication strategies
5: Excellent
20 points
A description of three communication strategies and how they can improve communication to support team functioning while meeting the preferences of stakeholders is present and through.
4: Good
18.4 points
A description of three communication strategies and how they can improve communication to support team functioning while meeting the preferences of stakeholders is present and detailed.
3: Satisfactory
17.6 points
A description of three communication strategies and how they can improve communication to support team functioning while meeting the preferences of stakeholders is present.
2: Less Than Satisfactory
16 points
A description of three communication strategies and how they can improve communication to support team functioning while meeting the preferences of stakeholders is present but is incomplete or incorrect.
1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
A description of three communication strategies and how they can improve communication to support team functioning while meeting the preferences of stakeholders is not present.
Thesis Development and Purpose
7 points
Criteria Description
Thesis Development and Purpose
5: Excellent
7 points
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
4: Good
6.44 points
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
3: Satisfactory
6.16 points
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
2: Less Than Satisfactory
5.6 points
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.
1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Argument Logic and Construction
8 points
Criteria Description
Argument Logic and Construction
5: Excellent
8 points
Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
4: Good
7.36 points
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
3: Satisfactory
7.04 points
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
2: Less Than Satisfactory
6.4 points
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
5 points
Criteria Description
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
5: Excellent
5 points
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
4: Good
4.6 points
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
3: Satisfactory
4.4 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
2: Less Than Satisfactory
4 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.
Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
5 points
Criteria Description
Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
5: Excellent
5 points
All format elements are correct.
4: Good
4.6 points
Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
3: Satisfactory
4.4 points
Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
2: Less Than Satisfactory
4 points
Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.
1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
Documentation of Sources
5 points
Criteria Description
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
5: Excellent
5 points
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
4: Good
4.6 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
3: Satisfactory
4.4 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
2: Less Than Satisfactory
4 points
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Sources are not documented.
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: HQS 620 Communication Plan Assignment
