Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
Content
Name: PRAC_6675_Week11_Assignment_Rubric
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assimilation and Synthesis: Content Reflection | Points: Points Range: 45 (45%) – 50 (50%) Reflection demonstrates a high level of critical thinking in applying and integrating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, and/or experiences. Insightful and relevant connections are made through contextual explanations and examples. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 40 (40%) – 44 (44%) Reflection demonstrates moderate level of critical thinking in applying and integrating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, and/or experiences. Connections are made through explanations and/or examples. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 35 (35%) – 39 (39%) Reflection demonstrates minimal critical thinking in applying and integrating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, and/or experiences. Minimal connections are made through explanations and/or examples. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 34 (34%) Reflection lacks critical thinking. Superficial connections are made with key course concepts and resources, and/or assignments. Feedback: |
| Assimilation and Synthesis: Personal Growth | Points: Points Range: 27 (27%) – 30 (30%) Expresses solid evidence of reflection on own work. Demonstrates substantial personal growth and awareness of deeper meaning through inferences, well-developed insights, and significant depth in awareness and challenges. Synthesizes current experience into future implications. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 24 (24%) – 26 (26%) Expresses moderate evidence of reflection on own work. Demonstrates satisfactory personal growth and awareness through some inferences, insights, and challenges. There is mention of the future implications of student’s current experience. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 21 (21%) – 23 (23%) Expresses minimal evidence of reflection on own work. Demonstrates less than adequate personal growth and awareness through limited or simplistic inferences made, insights, and/or challenges that are not well developed. There is minimal thought of future implications of student’s current experience. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 20 (20%) Expresses inadequate evidence of reflection on own work. Personal growth and awareness are not evident and/or demonstrate an impersonal experience. Lacks personal insights, challenges, inferences, and/or future implications are overlooked. Feedback: |
| Written Expression and Formatting | Points: Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%) Well written and clearly organized using standard English; characterized by elements of a strong writing style; and basically free from grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling errors. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 12 (12%) – 13 (13%) Above average writing style and logically organized using standard English with minor errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 11 (11%) – 11 (11%) Average writing style that is sometimes unclear and/or with some errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 10 (10%) oor writing style lacking in standard English, clarity, language used, and/or contains frequent errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling. Needs work. Feedback: |
| APA | Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Contains no APA errors. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains 1–2 APA errors. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains 3–5 APA errors. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains more than 5 APA errors. Feedback: |
Show Descriptions Show Feedback
Assimilation and Synthesis: Content Reflection–
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 45 (45%) – 50 (50%) Reflection demonstrates a high level of critical thinking in applying and integrating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, and/or experiences. Insightful and relevant connections are made through contextual explanations and examples. Good 40 (40%) – 44 (44%) Reflection demonstrates moderate level of critical thinking in applying and integrating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, and/or experiences. Connections are made through explanations and/or examples. Fair 35 (35%) – 39 (39%) Reflection demonstrates minimal critical thinking in applying and integrating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, and/or experiences. Minimal connections are made through explanations and/or examples. Poor 0 (0%) – 34 (34%) Reflection lacks critical thinking. Superficial connections are made with key course concepts and resources, and/or assignments. Feedback:
Assimilation and Synthesis: Personal Growth–
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 27 (27%) – 30 (30%) Expresses solid evidence of reflection on own work. Demonstrates substantial personal growth and awareness of deeper meaning through inferences, well-developed insights, and significant depth in awareness and challenges. Synthesizes current experience into future implications. Good 24 (24%) – 26 (26%) Expresses moderate evidence of reflection on own work. Demonstrates satisfactory personal growth and awareness through some inferences, insights, and challenges. There is mention of the future implications of student’s current experience. Fair 21 (21%) – 23 (23%) Expresses minimal evidence of reflection on own work. Demonstrates less than adequate personal growth and awareness through limited or simplistic inferences made, insights, and/or challenges that are not well developed. There is minimal thought of future implications of student’s current experience. Poor 0 (0%) – 20 (20%) Expresses inadequate evidence of reflection on own work. Personal growth and awareness are not evident and/or demonstrate an impersonal experience. Lacks personal insights, challenges, inferences, and/or future implications are overlooked. Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting–
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 14 (14%) – 15 (15%) Well written and clearly organized using standard English; characterized by elements of a strong writing style; and basically free from grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling errors. Good 12 (12%) – 13 (13%) Above average writing style and logically organized using standard English with minor errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling. Fair 11 (11%) – 11 (11%) Average writing style that is sometimes unclear and/or with some errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling. Poor 0 (0%) – 10 (10%) oor writing style lacking in standard English, clarity, language used, and/or contains frequent errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling. Needs work. Feedback:
APA–
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Contains no APA errors. Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains 1–2 APA errors. Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains 3–5 APA errors. Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains more than 5 APA errors. Feedback:
| Total Points: 100 |
|---|
